The West is a suicide cult
Civilizations are organisms which follow the life cycle of a mammal. Birth, infancy, youth, maturity, senescence and final break up.
Final break up is another term for death, one I like because it expresses what happens as our bodies disintegrate into parts. I prefer to think of my body as a blend of the earth, fire, air and water elements of classical Greek and Indian thought. This helps in understanding and relating to my own demise. We live under the illusion at every moment of being a solid unity even as millions of cells are born, mature, wear out, die.
The West is moribund, having a few last gasps left before it breaks up into its constituent elements. What are those rudiments of the civilizational organism? Not earth, fire, air and water, but smaller nations which are bankrupt, ripped by violence and sharp political divisions, lacking any direction, rudderless. Countries formerly homogenous and white will break into different enclaves made up of various and sundry swarthy people wearing permanent urban scowls. The West itself has had a bad smell to it for quite some time and the white European genome will disappear as it is blended away by an unending tidal wave of black and brown immigrants. These masses are limitless relative to the beleaguered nihilistic tribes living on a tiny little peninsula that hangs off on the edge of a far greater land mass.
Tens of thousands of years went into making the European type and this goes beyond skin deep differences in physiognomy. The openness, sociability and ingenuity of the European were caused by environmental pressures. Traits affecting emotions, intelligence were forged by long cold winters and environmental factors like geography, flora and fauna. We ended up with a race of men who were explorers, always on the hunt for game.
Curiosity and intelligence go together. One report I saw years ago said that as much as 80% of human DNA influenced intelligence, behavior and all of the intangible qualities which make us individuals. In addition, evolution works on a much faster time scale than most equalitarians want to admit, so separation by distance, accessibility means that, no, we're not all just the same animals with different skin tones. Far from it. Most hard core members of scientism have an ideology which precludes evolution working beneath the skin.
All of the quirks and interesting things in terms of personality and temperament were probably found in an ancestor. Human biology is about combining and recombining different elements in varied configurations over generations. Personality is, at least according to this view, mostly genetic. I've learned how to see my own personality as an inherited trunk of hand-me-downs. Reframing things in this way helps you to understand the moments where you step into a skin, a persona. These are transitional moments, where you vest yourself in yourself for some social engagement or ritual constructed by biological processes stretched out over thousands of years.
Those carefully crafted traits of the European worked really, really well when oil was locked in the ground and technology was still primitive. Contrary to Netflix and popular media, there were no black vikings. There were no Africans who were kings and queens of England, either by birth or marriage. Europe was very much an isolated genetic laboratory and contacts between civilizations, while not uncommon, did not involve the whole and complete displacement of large chunks of the gene pool via motorboats, airplanes, cars and trains.
The adaptive traits have worked long and hard against the European in more recent times. Cursed to invent the vast majority of modern conveniences, we've sealed our own fate by becoming slaves to them, something Tolkien warned about using the language of metaphor in his Rings series. Those traits of openness, sociability and high trust were easily exploited by bad actors, internal and external. Internally, the rapacious spirit of the white Anglo-Saxon was used in England to loot centuries of wealth built up and held in common trust by the Catholic Church.
I looked up a map of aristocratic holdings in the modern UK. It's absolutely astounding how much land is still controlled by the hereditary aristocrats, their land all stolen in a great span of looting and destruction five centuries ago. Check the lineage of any duke, see where his wealth derives and it comes directly from the English Reformation. This original sin, this massive wealth inequality is the heart and soul of modern capitalism. When the looting was finished in England, it was spread to Ireland and later, North America. The same spirit of theft propelled the other European nations to imitate the English and by the 20th century, all major powers held colonies throughout the world.
The northern European open society was easily and brutally exploited by men who missed receiving the open traits via breeding. The English did to the old order and its peasants horrible things, creating in the process a blueprint for later mass, technologically-powered genocides, mass evictions and so on. Technology makes everything efficient, including the extinction of your own countrymen. The English Protestants showed us this early on.
Even after two world wars and the physical and spiritual destruction of the European continent as a result, the lust for looting and theft hasn't abated.
I wrote earlier in one of my anti-Christ posts about Tony Blair and his tireless advocacy for digital IDs. Blair, a convert to Catholicism, has been a herald of the Beast system. I've no idea why he bothered to convert to Christianity. Maybe he thought he needed some kind of spiritual cover while he went about evangelizing on behalf of capitalism's next great leap forward: a single world currency that underlies and controls every aspect of human life around the globe. The English are no stranger to enclosing people in spaces, real or virtual.
The capitalist always creates the crisis that necessitates his heavy handed intervention. Late 19th century currency crises approximated the obliteration of gold-backed money in the U.S., courtesy of capitalist machinations. The entire banking system has since been turned over to private interests and has been a vast looting machine of the lower classes ever since. The U.S. ceded the oversight and issuance of its own currency, setting up an arrangement where citizens pay private banks to handle these things. It's such a staggering concession when you stop and think about it carefully. How weak were the men of the 19th and 20th centuries. No soy, no seed oils then.
The Federal Reserve System, which implies a public institution, was laid out in a weekend by private bankers who met at Jekyll Island. The men of that generation were too weak, too dumb, too venal to stop it. Supine, they sat back as a tiny coterie of gangsters took control of the most powerful nation ever conceived. The old exploitation of the peasants of Protestant England gave way to the looting of an entire nation, its wealth, its people.
The capitalist clamored for open borders and cheap labor for decades, promising that this was the only way – the only way – to ensure a decent standard of living for the masses. You can no longer build anything, you can no longer make a living as a farmer... we must have third world labor living here...
If you don't accept these terms, you will be forced to pick your own vegetables in a hot sun for twenty cents per day. Americans and Europeans gladly accepted sterility, debt slavery and lawlessness in exchange for conveniences. There is nothing convenient about the things listed, but the human mind latches onto immediate, tangible comforts even as the Big Picture becomes a burden, a prison even. Debt slavery doesn't seem so bad when you have a credit card and a vague hope that someday, you'll come into some money that will let you pay it off.
The capitalist clamored again for cheap labor for technical white collar professions and he was of course granted his desire with the H1-B. Thousands and thousands of Americans are displaced every year by Indians, who are imported and used as indentured servants. Indentured servitude is incredibly WASP-y, being baked into the American system from the beginning. Modern white identity types have huge blind spots when examining the sources of our current predicament. What's happening now is a continuation of practices started in the 1500s. Own that shit. Don't point your finger at the usual suspects for a practice long used in the Anglo-Saxon world.
The Anglo capitalist convinced his own people of something that has never happened: that a nation cannot produce goods, even its own food, and be prosperous by doing it well. At no point in history has any great civilization said, "We could be so much better off by ridding ourselves of production and relying instead on finance and exploitable, alien labor living in huge masses in our own country, or by supply chains that go literally to the other side of the globe." Even ancient Rome had to produce most of its goods during its period of decline before collapse. Yes, they extended the franchise, but only because Romans lost the willingness to even procreate more of themselves.
Were these Romans capitalists? If capitalism is the result of stealing shit from other people, from the public coffers whether cultural or economic as I've suggested with the English Reformation, then yes. Romans were capitalists. Theft, murder and violence begets wealth and empire and those in turn poison the victors.
Capitalism is such a flawed system that it cannot produce more of its own people, the ones who make the system possible in the first place. This is only partially true; technology, when it becomes sufficiently advanced, makes procreation's downsides more apparent, more forego-able. In a society where agriculture is handled by 2-3% of the population, the other 97% are faced with having children who are no longer producers and invaluable helpers in the struggle for survival. They are instead, thanks to judges, lawyers, universities and of course, capitalists, a massive liability. When my mom reached 18, she was kicked out of the house. In later decades, parents had to continue supporting their kids well into their late twenties. Did the advances in technology, productivity and education in the capitalist system lead to grown men living with their parents into their 30s?
In any world where goods and services are plentiful (think Star Trek) people would probably have one or two kids because free time would be plentiful, food, clothing and shelter more than adequate. Maybe some individuals would choose even larger families, seeing the social circle as rewarding and very low risk to their own survival. If you only need to work a few hours a week, then there's plenty of time to raise and educate children, who are fun, lively and loving if handled correctly. Imagine for a moment a world in which social media didn't exist, but the material basis for life was a non-issue for everyone. Would it be paradise? No, but it would be a better place, more wholesome probably.
But in capitalism's current state, children remain a liability. I can't imagine anyone with young children not being fearful of having to support them into old age. What future do these kids have in a world where capitalism controls the spigot of endless brown immigration, where AI is pressed into our faces each day as an existential threat to economic life, even to the same brown servants capitalist organs like Google and Microsoft have come to depend on. One young father I know stresses about what his young kids will have in the way of a livelihood when they reach adulthood.
Color me cynical, but the Trump executive order to place a high fee on H1-B labor coincides with the advent of AI agents, who are supposed to replace white collar labor en masse over the next few years. The rug pull came a few days after the announcement; the teeth of his edict were mostly pulled out. Doesn't matter. The symbolic pushback on the H1-B scam was all red meat for the MAGA camp.
On the eve of AI's big breakout into cube farms, even Indians are too expensive and the H1-B program is no longer needed. Trump scores a point with yet another empty gesture, but the peasants are no longer paying attention. The MAGA enthusiasm in my red part of the state has vanished. No swag, no flags, no bumperstickers and hats. Nothing.
AI agents and the replacement of labor – the eviction of humans into penned off areas – is just the English Reformation continued.
Again, color me cynical regarding the symbolic gesture to limit the H1-B indentured servitude program right on the eve of AI agents. The damage has already been done.
The link below discusses Kei Starmer's push for a digital ID to solve the problem created by Western government: unchecked illegal immigration. His government does not want to get rough, force the invaders out by denying benefits, locking them up as invaders and lawbreakers (which they are), or punishing the private interests which move them around (NGOs).
Nope.
He wants you to believe that the government, which takes eye watering levels of wealth from its citizen-slaves, needs additional powers which target everyone, not just illegal invaders. In order to stop the illegal invasion, the UK government will need a way to track your every movement, every transaction even if your forefathers have been living in the same area since – without exaggeration in many European cases – 4,000 BCE. It's for your own good. The modern Brit can't think in terms of time, generations, heritage and so on. Most will settle for being lumped in the same category as the Jamaican who showed up five years ago.
Starmer is just the latest in centuries-long line of WASP overlords who have stomped on the peasants before tossing them half dead into a ditch.
Tyler Durden
